We recently discussed some of the arguments against this conventional wisdom in The Myth of Small Business Job Creation. It was pointed out that "true" small businesses create few jobs because most fail—almost immediately, and the ones that endure are mostly intended to stay small. It was also pointed out that huge multinational companies have been ineffective at creating jobs—at least in this country. One was left with the suspicion that job creation comes from the entrepreneurs who think big but are forced to start small. In other words, we need another category or term to describe the enterprises where the jobs are actually created.
A recent article in The Economist closes the loop on these thoughts: A helping hand for start-ups.
This statement is consistent with the notion that job growth comes from small companies, but additional specification is required.
The implication is that the focus should not be on "small businesses" but on start-ups with promising ideas and grand ambitions. It is suggested that these types of entrepreneurs have been seriously hindered by the effects of the recent financial disaster.
Given this input, the advice is to provide more support for this class of "small business" and worry less about the traditional, broad class of small businesses. There is a role for government to play, but the article is more enthusiastic about private contributions in support of start-ups. It references an initiative called "MassChallenge:"
"John Harthorne, a co-founder of MassChallenge, wants to improve on the typical Silicon Valley model of incubating start-ups. Venture capitalists insist that the start-ups they help surrender equity; MassChallenge does not. This makes it easier to attract broader support and voluntary help from businesses, and allows non-profit start-ups to take part. Helping such firms grow is an extremely cost-effective way to create jobs, argues Mr Harthorne; the first class of finalists have already hired over 500 more people than the 330 they began with."
Apparently this message is being heard in Washington.
This all sounds great—now let’s hope it works. At least we now have a better understanding of where to focus resources.
No comments:
Post a Comment