Specter describes what can only be referred to as a revolution in medical science. For decades we have assumed that who we are is essentially determined by our genetic makeup. Sickness could then be explained by a genetic malfunction. That may no longer be an appropriate assumption.
We are provided this background information:
One of the medical truths we face is that we are undergoing an epidemic of certain conditions: obesity, autism, food allergies, asthma.... It is difficult to assign such rapid growth in these illnesses to genetic conditions. There is a circumstantial evidence that associates the growth in incidence of these conditions with the growth in use of antibiotics. Antibiotics were lifesavers for many, and bacteria were viewed as things to be expunged from our systems. The net effect of continued and continual use of antibiotics is to upset our microbial makeup. Evidence is accumulating that indicates serious side effects effects can ensue.
Specter provides Martin J. Blaser, chairman of the Department of Medicine at New York University as a guide to this burgeoning field of study. He explains how the practice of medicine itself can be responsible for perturbing our microbial content—our microbiome.
Cesarean sections had the unintended effect of altering a child’s bacterial makeup.
The usage of antibiotics is dominant in producing bacterial losses that accumulate and grow over successive generations.
Blaser adds:
"We are not talking about illnesses that are increasing by ten percent....They are doubling and tripling and quadrupling. With each generation, there is a heavier impact on early-life microbiome. And it means that we are less and less able to metabolize the food we eat."
Specter focuses on one microbe as an example of how complex the task of understanding our microbiome will be: H. pylori. This bacterium also provides a cautionary tale for those who would rush in with cures.
This is the bacterium that was identified in 1982 as the cause of gastritis and peptic ulcers. This discovery led to effective treatments of these conditions using antibiotics. It was so successful that people talked about eliminating it entirely. Few people stopped to question how natural selection allowed this bacterium to survive in humans when it had such ill effects. Further research has shown that H. pylori actually provides a number of beneficial effects, particularly at a young age.
Consequences from the disappearance of H. pylori are beginning to emerge from research activities.
"There is equally convincing evidence that destroying H. pylori could alter metabolism in ways that increase the risk of obesity. Several research groups, including Blaser’s, have found a strong relationship in humans between the bacterium and two stomach hormones, ghrelin and leptin, both of which play central roles in regulating our appetites....The more ghrelin you have in your bloodstream, the more likely you are to overeat. Leptin functions in the opposite way, suppressing appetite and increasing energy levels. For people whose stomachs are infected by H. pylori, ghrelin became far less detectable after a meal. For the others, levels of the hormone remained high, and the effects are evident."
It would seem that we have created a generation of children whose mechanism for controlling food consumption has been damaged, making it more difficult for them to avoid overeating.
If this research holds up, it has profound implications for our nation as it contends with rising healthcare costs. While potentially a medical disaster, it also holds out the promise that there might be simple and inexpensive corrective steps that could be taken.
A probiotic would be something that attempts to alter the microbiome in a beneficial manner, perhaps by introducing strains of bacteria. Products that claim to be probiotics are readily available. There doesn’t seem to be any science behind any of the products or their claims, and regulators have refused to recognize their efficacy at this point.
The potential for making money with products labeled as probiotics has not gone unnoticed in the commercial sector. Many companies have found more lenient controls in Asian countries and are developing growing markets for their products there. An article in Bloomberg Businessweek addressed the global market that has arisen for these proclaimed probiotics.
We seem to be emerging from a period in which we aggressively tried to kill any microbe we encountered without understanding what the consequences might be, and have entered a period in which we are being induced to stuff ourselves with all kinds of microbes without understanding what the consequences might be.
Strange....
A treatment with antibiotics may have consequences because these pharmaceutical products can’t distinguish between good and bad bacteria. This is one of the main reasons why an antibiotics treatment can lead to a serious imbalance in the gastrointestinal flora.
ReplyDeleteMany people that have to take antibiotics may experience diarrhea as a consequence. This diarrhea is often the result of clostridium difficile overgrowth.
Studies suggest that about 300,000 people in the US are hospitalized every single year because of a clostridium difficile infection. The results of 23 clinical studies show that taking a probiotic supplement will increase the risk of suffering from such an infection significantly.