Obama has also been talking seriously about the threat income inequality poses for our nation. It has become quite clear over recent decades that the inevitable evolution of an unconstrained free-market economy will lead to ever-growing income inequality as more earnings accrue to the owners of capital and less to laborers. This divergence has led to stagnant or falling real wages for most workers in the nation.
The one possible solution that involves little political upheaval and directly addresses the issue at hand is to raise the floor on wages to counter the decline that is occurring. Much has been claimed about what effects might follow from a significant increase. Clearly, some people would lose their jobs, but, just as certainly, other jobs would be created by the increased spending that would take place. Economists are coming around to the view that such increases in the minimum wage are likely to have a small effect on the total number of jobs.
Politically, some would view this as a redistribution of income from the wealthy to the poor and oppose it for that reason. It is probably more accurate to view such a move as a redistribution of profit between various industries. Some would see costs go up and profits decrease, but others would benefit from the increased demand created by the higher wages.
An increase in the minimum wage might have a greater effect on income inequality than most suspect. Employees tend to view their compensation with respect to the premium they are paid over the minimum wage. If fast-food workers were to attain a $15 wage, do you think the auto companies could pay starting auto workers $14 an hour? Raising the minimum would likely send ripples well up into the higher wage brackets.
A large boost in the minimum wage is an experiment waiting to happen. And now it looks like someone has taken that first step.
Steve Coll has an interesting note in The New Yorker where he discusses the approval of a $15 minimum wage for some workers in the city of SeaTac. If that name sounds familiar it is because that town is where the Seattle-Tacoma airport resides.
Needless to say, this bold move aroused considerable local activity.
The election was held on November 5 and the proposition passed by 77 votes out of a total of about 6,000. Coll suggests that a recount might possibly overturn the results. However, an editorial from the Seattle Times dated December, 8, 2013 contains this comment:
"BACKERS of a $15 minimum wage who are celebrating victory in SeaTac now aim to seize the day in Seattle. They do have the political momentum. What they don’t have is a sense of responsibility or of any information on the actual effects of the law they favor."
There is no mention of a recount threat, but there is the comment about the possibility Seattle voters might be interested in a similar move.
SeaTac is an ideal place to begin a minimum-wage movement. Because it contains the regional airport it captures a number of employers with very deep pockets, including major airlines and hotel chains. These businesses would have a difficult time saying that they cannot afford to pay more to a hand full of baggage handlers or maids. However, it is faulty as an economic demonstration project. The proposition approved does not include all workers. It would take a place that is big and diverse such as Seattle to perform the appropriate experiment.
The idea of a significant rise in the minimum wage is not politically impossible. As Coll points out:
All great movements start with a single step. Stay tuned!
No comments:
Post a Comment