Uber is the most prominent member of a group of companies
that offer opportunities for people to earn money by contracting (often quite informally)
to perform tasks for a given price. In Uber’s
case, drivers use their own vehicle to drive passengers from one location to
the other. Uber provides the platform
that connects the driver and passenger, collects a fee for this service, and
manages the payment process. The drivers
are considered independent contractors (thus far) and are responsible for
meeting their expenses of doing business including tax requirements and
providing any benefits, such as healthcare, that may be required. This is a common situation for those in the
gig economy.
Many, particularly those involved in providing such
platforms, think of this as a job creating environment in which workers benefit
from controlling their schedules and work habits. Critics denounce such arrangements as
converting full-time work into day-labor jobs in which workers collaborate with
businesses in order to perform tasks for as little pay as possible. Uber, as a provider of employment, has been
studied by many academics, but the results have been confused by differing
assumptions about compensation and expenses for its drivers. Lawrence Mishel has attempted to put all the
various studies on the same basis in order to eliminate the disparities. His work was published by the Economic Policy Institute as Uber and the labor market: Uber drivers’compensation, wages, and the scale of Uber and the gig economy.
Mishel provides a detailed analysis of the compensation
issues for Uber drivers. Here, only his
conclusions are presented. Uber begins
by taking about a third of the charges paid by the customer to cover the
service it has provided the driver. The
actual cost of the service is determined by Uber.
“Uber driver compensation—the income drivers get after
deducting Uber fees and driver vehicle expenses from passenger fares—averages
$11.77 an hour. This average Uber driver hourly compensation is substantially
less than the $32.06 average hourly compensation of private-sector workers and
less than the $14.99 average hourly compensation of workers in the lowest-paid
major occupation (service occupation workers).”
The
figure of $11.77 per hour does not include payroll taxes (Social Security and
Medicare) that the driver is required to pay, nor does it include the expense
of any benefits such as healthcare.
After payroll taxes are deducted the figure falls to $10.87.
“Uber driver “discretionary
compensation”—the income drivers get after deducting Uber fees and vehicle
expenses and the mandatory extra Social
Security/Medicare taxes that self-employed drivers must pay—averages $10.87 an
hour.”
Mishel further estimates a wage that is comparable to
those of traditional workers who usually receive at least some benefits from
their employer.
“The Uber driver “wage”—comparable to the wages (reported
for employees on federal tax Form W-2) earned by regular W-2 employees—averages
$9.21 an hour. (We calculate this W-2 equivalent wage by deducting the
following in order, from passenger payments: all Uber fees, such as booking
fees and commissions; vehicle expenses; and the cost of a modest benefits
package, including mandatory employer-side payroll taxes. Our estimate also
takes into account expense and benefit interactions with the federal tax code).”
The
net wage to compare with other types of employment then drops to $9.21 per
hour.
“The Uber driver W-2 equivalent
hourly wage is roughly at the 10th percentile of all wage and salary workers’
wages, meaning Uber drivers earn less than what 90 percent of workers earn. The
Uber driver W-2 equivalent hourly wage falls below the mandated minimum wage in
the majority of major Uber urban markets…”
Given these results, Uber, as a representative of the gig
economy, is not promising as a creator of jobs.
Who needs a technology that produces minimum wage or below jobs? But is Uber actually creating jobs, or is it
merely a platform by which those with an income can add to it by working additional
hours for Uber?
“Uber drivers have high turnover
and, on average, work only part of the year (an average of three months) and
part time (an average of 17 hours per week).”
Converting Uber drivers’ participation in the economy to
a full-time equivalent (an FTE, 40 hours per week for a full year), Mishel
finds that Uber activity is a tiny part of the overall employment figure. He also takes Uber’s estimated two-thirds
share of the gig economy and concludes that the entire gig economy is also
tiny both in terms of employment and economic activity.
“There are about 833,000 Uber driver participants in a year.
If one weights participants by their weeks worked and their weekly hours, then
Uber drivers amount to 90,521 full-time, full-year equivalent (FTE) workers and
account for just 0.07 percent of national FTE employment. We scale this
proportion by Uber’s two-thirds share of the gig economy (according to research
by Seth Harris of Cornell University and Alan Krueger of Princeton University)
and find that the entire gig economy—online platform employment—accounts for
just 0.1 percent of national FTE employment. Uber and the entire gig economy
are not a significant portion of the national economy despite several years of
rapid growth.”
“Uber drivers’ aggregate compensation, based on total hours
worked and hourly compensation, is roughly $5.0 billion, or 0.022 percent of
aggregate national compensation (one-fifth of 0.1 percent). Adjusting for
Uber’s two-thirds share of the gig economy, we find that the total compensation
for the entire gig economy—online platform employment—accounts for just 0.034
percent of total national compensation.”
While
Uber is big enough to generate disruption in the traditional taxi market, it
and its siblings don’t seem to be heralding a revolution in the economics of
employment.
No comments:
Post a Comment